Solana’s performance evolution over the past three years has made it the de facto choice for high-frequency DeFi apps, NFT platforms, and trading systems. But the raw speed of Solana (65,000+ TPS theoretical, ~4,000–6,000 real TPS in 2025) means one thing: your RPC (Remote Procedure Call) connection can make or break your product.
Failing RPC nodes create bottlenecks for trading desks, missed NFT drops, and failed dApp transactions. That’s why, in 2025, choosing the right Solana RPC provider has almost the same weight as choosing your core cloud vendor.
This guide focuses on the best Solana RPC providers. We’ll compare performance, pricing, reliability, and advanced features—so you can make informed executive decisions for your infrastructure strategy.
Below is a carefully curated list of the most relevant RPC providers in 2025—starting with Dysnix, which focuses on enterprise-grade reliability and custom infra.
RPC Fast is a new-generation Solana RPC provider emphasizing global distribution and developer simplicity. Unlike many multi-chain vendors, RPC Fast positions itself as a performance‑first platform, building bare‑metal clusters across multiple regions to reduce slot lag and increase transaction landing rates.
Key strong sides:
Explore more dedicated Solana RPC nodes by RPC Fast.
Perfect for high-volume dApps, NFT launches, and trading desks that demand speed but appreciate a leaner pricing model.
Solana-native RPC provider known for its rich developer tools and enhanced APIs. Popular with NFT projects and consumer-facing dApps. Core strengths:
Typical use case: NFT marketplaces or wallets needing data-rich APIs without custom indexers.
One of the fastest Solana RPC providers, prized by trading desks and latency-sensitive apps. Market makers, MEV traders, bots—anyone where milliseconds equal money—admire Triton One.
More strong sides:
A multi-chain infrastructure giant serving Ethereum, Solana, and dozens more. Known for broad ecosystem integrations. Great option for those consolidating multi-chain projects under one provider.
Famous for:
Once Ethereum-first, now a multi-chain supernode platform. Trusted by the largest dApps (e.g., OpenSea). Fits best for enterprises wanting a familiar DevEx with cross-chain reach. Other features:
Solana-focused provider with a heavy emphasis on observability and real-time insights. Projects needing deep observability pipelines baked into RPC are the core audience of this provider. Core strengths:
getProgramAccounts
).Cost-effective provider with self-healing elastic nodes and strong SMB appeal. Teams scaling from proof of concept to production gradually might find their services interesting. Why people like this provider:
Hint: Best for resiliency strategies—not recommended as your only provider, but crucial as a global fallback.
After this brief introduction, let’s dive deeper into the practical aspects of choosing your RPC node provider for your Solana project.
There is no single “most promising” RPC—you’ll optimize everything for your workload: read-heavy indexing, write-heavy trading, or mixed dApp traffic. Prioritize SWQoS, staked endpoints, Jito bundles, Yellowstone gRPC, Geyser streams, and durable nonce/priority fee strategy over marketing RPS. Executives evaluating providers should focus on:
As CTO, consider the following when making your architecture decisions: most production stacks use a staked, Solana-native RPC for critical writes, a multi-chain provider for resilience, and a decentralized gateway for fallback. Public endpoints are for dev/test only, rate-limited, and throttled when necessary. Monitor all metrics: request/slot lag, compute units, confirmation spread, dropped WS events, and transaction landing rates.
At Dysnix, we often guide enterprise clients through these trade-offs, balancing staked RPCs for guaranteed writes with multi-chain providers for resilience.
Pro hack: Smart stacks combine dedicated staked RPC (low latency) + API-rich RPC (developer UX) + decentralized fallback (resilience).
Provider | Latency (avg) | Uptime SLA | Special Feature |
---|---|---|---|
RPC Fast | 120–150ms | 99.99% | Geo-distributed bare-metal nodes |
Triton One | 100–120ms | Staked nodes, gRPC | |
Helius | 140ms | Enhanced APIs | |
QuickNode | 160ms | Marketplace integrations | |
Alchemy | 170ms | Supernode correctness | |
Syndica | 180ms | ChainStream logging | |
Chainstack | 190ms | Self-healing nodes | |
GenesysGo | 200+ms | N/A | Free access (capped) |
Modern providers offer more than just endpoints. Let’s see what connection options, integrations, and other bells and whistles are offered to boost your project.
Pro hack: For trading desks, Jito bundles + staked RPC paths are a must-have. For dApps: enhanced APIs (NFTs, tokens, indexing) significantly reduce backend costs.
Executives care about uptime because downtime = lost revenue.
Aspect | Dedicated nodes | Shared nodes |
---|---|---|
Performance | Guaranteed high throughput with isolated resources; no “noisy neighbor” effect. | Performance can degrade if other tenants consume heavy traffic. |
Latency | Consistently low latencies; suitable for trading, bots, and exchanges. | Latency may vary, especially during network congestion. |
Scalability | Customizable to scale on demand; supports extremely high workloads. | Limited by the provider’s fair-use policy or request caps. |
Reliability (SLA) | Enterprise-grade SLAs available (99.9–99.99% uptime). | SLA coverage often limited; some providers only offer “best effort.” |
Security & Compliance | Isolated environment → better data security, compliance (GDPR, ISO). | Shared keys and environments; less suitable for regulated industries. |
Cost | Higher: typically starting at ~$800–$1,000/month (Dysnix, Triton). | Lower: entry plans from $49/month, some free (QuickNode, Chainstack). |
Best For | Exchanges, institutional DeFi, HFT bots, consumer apps with millions of users. | Startups, MVPs, dApp prototyping, small projects with limited workload. |
Examples | Dysnix Dedicated RPCs, Triton Dedicated Nodes, Helius Dedicated Tiers. | QuickNode Free/Build plans, Chainstack Developer Tier, GenesysGo RPCs. |
Executive framework:
For further reading: Top 10 Dedicated Node Providers in 2025
All in all, you are not “buying an endpoint.” You are buying transaction landing reliability, scaling assurance, and compliance-ready infrastructure.
As a matter of fact, executives don’t need to track every RPC vendor detail — what matters is choosing the right combination of providers and configuring them with proper failover logic. That’s where partners like Dysnix help: designing custom RPC stacks, setting up provider redundancy, and ensuring enterprises hit both performance and compliance targets.
Subscribe