Let's imagine: you’re running a DeFi app, launching a zk-rollup, or building a real-time trading bot. Everything looks great in testnet. But then, traffic spikes, response times collapse, and your users hit a wall. Sound familiar?
That’s where dedicated blockchain nodes make all the difference.
A dedicated node is a private, non-shared blockchain instance set up specifically for your project, offering full bandwidth, guaranteed uptime, and custom configuration for optimal performance.
No neighbors. No noisy traffic. Just stable, high-performance infrastructure designed for scale.
In 2025, the node market is booming, but not all providers deliver on their promises. Some wrap basic SaaS APIs in fancy dashboards. Others offer accurate infrastructure-grade solutions with SLAs, geographic redundancy, and deep Web3 expertise.
We've done the homework for you.
In this guide, we break down the top 10 dedicated node providers in 2025 — the ones trusted by L1s, DeFi teams, trading firms, and serious Web3 builders.
When you spin up a dedicated node, you’re not just launching a server — you’re claiming an exclusive lane on the blockchain highway. No throttling, no noisy neighbors, no “rate limit exceeded.” This is your own isolated environment, configured and optimized for your exact needs — whether you’re processing millions of requests per hour or syncing custom indexers in real time.
Here’s how it works:
A dedicated node runs a full copy of the blockchain, either as a full node or an archive node, depending on your use case. It doesn’t share compute, memory, disk I/O, or bandwidth with other clients. That means your calls to eth_call, eth_getLogs, or getBlockByNumber are never stuck in a queue behind someone else’s NFT app or swap aggregator.
With shared or SaaS-style nodes, you’re tapping into a multi-tenant pool. Yes, it’s easy to launch, but your RPCs compete with thousands of others. Latency fluctuates, request caps kick in, and under-the-hood caching often distorts your data.
Dedicated infrastructure eliminates all of that. You control:
You can also colocate your dedicated nodes across multiple regions to reduce latency across user segments or algorithmic traders, deploy automated failovers with load balancers, and build observability pipelines that actually matter.
That’s why dedicated nodes are the backbone of serious Web3 infrastructure.
Who uses them?
Curious how MEV works on Solana? Check out our deep dive on MEV architecture, exploits, and what’s coming next here.
Unlike general-purpose API platforms, RPC Fast is purpose-built for serious teams that outgrow SaaS limitations. It's designed from the ground up to support pro traders, dApps, and high-throughput ecosystems where latency, reliability, and infrastructure control directly affect revenue.
Instead of offering “flexible endpoints,” RPC Fast delivers dedicated blockchain nodes optimized for speed, uptime, and custom needs — including HFT-grade Solana setups, regional node clusters, and fully isolated environments with no credit limits. Projects like PancakeSwap use RPC Fast to reduce latency by up to 76% and cut infrastructure costs by over 60%.
Solana HFT solution
Blazing-fast dedicated node + low-latency trading API with <4ms response and 83% first-block execution — built for snipers, HFT bots, and serious trading flows.
Learn more
This is not a plug-and-play API. It’s a tailored infrastructure layer — built to scale, benchmarked in production, and backed by a team that knows blockchain performance inside out.
Blockdaemon takes a unique approach to node infrastructure by operating a marketplace-style platform. Instead of offering static plans, it connects users with node access across more than 50 different blockchains, balancing flexibility with broad protocol support. Its model works well for developers who need infrastructure on demand and don’t want to manage low-level deployment.
Beyond node hosting, Blockdaemon also offers a robust API suite called Ubiquity, which includes endpoints for NFTs, multi-chain analytics, and raw blockchain data. This makes it a good fit for platforms that need both RPC access and enhanced data tooling, especially those building cross-chain products or NFT integrations.
Key features:
Alchemy is a popular choice among Web3 developers thanks to its reliable SaaS infrastructure, extensive chain support, and strong suite of developer tools. Rather than offering raw dedicated hardware, Alchemy provides a highly abstracted node environment with stable performance and deep integrations. It’s used by teams behind Opensea, Meta, Aave, and other major dApps.
Its platform is particularly appealing for teams that prioritize speed and multi-chain coverage over deep infrastructure-level control. With built-in support for smart wallets, webhooks, token APIs, and an SDK, Alchemy enables rapid product development, though it lacks the raw configurability of true dedicated nodes.
Key features:
While Blockdaemon emphasizes marketplace flexibility and Alchemy focuses on developer experience, Chainstack strikes a middle ground, offering managed infrastructure with more transparency and deeper control over deployment. It supports a wide range of protocols and lets teams spin up full, archive, and validator nodes via a clean interface or API.
What makes Chainstack stand out is its hybrid deployment model. You can choose between cloud-hosted nodes in major regions or run nodes on your own infrastructure using Chainstack’s orchestration tools. This gives teams more control without fully managing bare metal. It’s particularly useful for enterprise users who need to comply with internal hosting rules while still benefiting from managed services.
Key features:
QuickNode focuses on speed and ease of deployment, offering fast RPC access to a wide range of blockchains through a polished SaaS interface. Unlike Chainstack’s hybrid model, QuickNode sticks to fully managed infrastructure, making it a go-to choice for teams that want to launch quickly and don’t need infrastructure-level control.
Performance is the main selling point: QuickNode uses edge routing, global CDN distribution, and automatic scaling to deliver low-latency RPC responses. It also offers analytics, archive data, and enhanced APIs for NFT and token metadata.
Key features:
Ankr offers a Web3 infrastructure suite with a focus on distributed RPC endpoints, staking services, and liquid staking integrations. Compared to QuickNode, Ankr is more API-driven and leans into decentralized access points, allowing apps to route traffic across a global network of nodes, though most are still managed by Ankr or partners.
Ankr is best suited for projects that don’t need low-level control but want instant access to high-throughput RPCs across multiple chains. It also offers enterprise packages with SLAs, but fine-tuning or dedicated hardware is not its main strength.
Key features:
Where Ankr leans toward decentralized API access, GetBlock brings things closer to traditional infrastructure, with a focus on full node access, flexibility, and support for dozens of chains. It offers both shared and dedicated nodes, giving teams more control than typical SaaS platforms, but without the need to manage deployment from scratch.
GetBlock supports full and archive nodes via simple dashboards or API, and gives users the option to request custom node configurations for enterprise use. It’s not bare-metal-level customizable, but for many teams, it hits the sweet spot between control and convenience, especially for multi-chain projects that need predictable throughput and stable access.
Key features:
Allnodes is best known for its validator hosting, but also offers dedicated full nodes across several major blockchains. Unlike API-focused services, Allnodes provides node deployment as a product, with control over location, client type, and upgrade cycles.
It’s not built for teams needing high-frequency RPC access or complex indexing, but works well for staking projects, governance tools, or teams that want to run their own infrastructure without managing hardware directly.
Key features:
Tatum is a complete development platform for building blockchain apps without managing infrastructure. Instead of offering raw RPC access, Tatum abstracts it behind high-level SDKs, REST APIs, and unified interfaces for 90+ blockchains.
It’s designed for speed and developer productivity, not low-level control. You won’t configure clients or choose sync modes here, but you’ll be able to deploy wallets, mint NFTs, and connect to smart contracts with minimal code. That makes Tatum ideal for teams shipping fast in fintech, gaming, or enterprise pilots.
Key features:
RunNode is built specifically for Solana, offering scalable RPC endpoints optimized for performance and stability on this notoriously demanding chain. Unlike multi-chain platforms like GetBlock, RunNode goes deep into one ecosystem — and that focus pays off in reliability.
It supports both shared and dedicated RPC access, making it useful for Solana-based dApps that need stable access to mainnet without running their own validators or nodes. With built-in load balancing and staking integrations, it’s a solid choice for projects all-in on Solana.
Key features:
When choosing blockchain infrastructure, teams often ask: Should we opt for a dedicated node or simply integrate with a SaaS/API provider?
If you’ve already explored dedicated nodes, you likely know what they bring to the table: full control, maximum uptime, and predictable performance.
SaaS nodes, on the other hand, offer a completely different trade-off.
They’re quick to integrate, require zero DevOps, and come with polished dashboards, but they’re built for ease, not for scale.
Want a clearer view? Here's a breakdown:
So, when should you actually choose SaaS nodes?
They make sense when you’re moving fast and don’t need much.
If you’re:
then a SaaS/API node will do the job. Quick setup, minimal hassle, low cost.
However, once your app starts growing or the stakes increase, things change.
If you’re:
then a shared node simply won’t hold up.
You’ll hit request ceilings, suffer from inconsistent state, and experience downtime you can’t control. And that’s exactly where dedicated nodes step in.
So, you've decided that shared nodes aren’t enough, and you're ready to switch to dedicated infrastructure. That’s a solid move. But before jumping in, it’s worth understanding what actually separates a great node provider from an average one.
Service Level Agreements (SLAs) define the operational baseline you can expect and should never be taken lightly. A serious provider will offer 99.9% to 99.99% uptime guarantees, backed by financial compensation in case of downtime.
Verify if SLAs are chain-specific and whether they encompass not only node availability but also data freshness, sync status, and RPC responsiveness. It’s also important to verify if they use redundant setups (active/passive or active/active) and automated health checks to recover from node stalls or forks. Access to a public status page, historical uptime logs, and real-time incident reporting channels (e.g., Slack or email) are indicators of transparency and a team that prioritizes uptime.
Look for providers that offer geographically distributed infrastructure, ideally with node provisioning in at least 3–5 global regions (e.g., US East/West, Frankfurt, Singapore, Tokyo).
Even better if you can deploy in custom locations, co-located with your other infrastructure or your liquidity centers. Ask whether the provider supports zone-aware load balancing, failover between regions, and proximity routing via Anycast or DNS-level configuration. Providers who rely on a single region or fixed deployment model become a risk once you scale past a single user cohort.
Depending on your company structure, KYC can be a blocker or a requirement. Some enterprise-grade providers require full KYC verification, including corporate docs, billing addresses, and sometimes contractual onboarding.
Others offer KYC-free self-service access, which is essential for DAOs, pseudonymous founders, early-stage DeFi protocols, or teams operating across uncertain jurisdictions. If time-to-deploy matters, look for providers that support instant access via credit card, crypto payments, or API token generation, with optional KYC only if you exceed usage thresholds or require SLAs.
The real power of dedicated nodes is in their configurability. A top-tier provider will allow full control over:
It should also be possible to run custom scripts, install sidecar containers (like Prometheus exporters or ELK agents), and monitor resource usage at OS level. Beware providers that claim to offer "dedicated" nodes but lock you into a predefined stack with zero visibility or tuning options.
Pricing should reflect compute, not just bandwidth or requests. Look for providers who price based on instance specifications (vCPUs, RAM, disk type, traffic allowance) with no hidden rate-limiting or burst charges.
You should have clear access to pricing tiers for different use cases — e.g., high-IO archive nodes, low-latency validators, or lightweight full nodes. The best setups allow for vertical scaling (more CPU/RAM on same node) and horizontal scaling (replicated endpoints for traffic balancing) without full redeployment. Bonus points for providers offering hourly or per-minute billing, especially in cloud-native environments.
Strong providers expose:
For high-value setups, expect 24/7 support, with guaranteed response SLAs depending on severity level. Ideally, engineers should be reachable via Slack, Telegram, or ticketing systems and have the authority to act, not just escalate.
If your product depends on uptime, speed, or data consistency, dedicated nodes offer a safer and more scalable path. They give you control over sync, latency, and performance, without surprises when traffic spikes.
Among the providers we reviewed, RPC Fast stands out as the most complete solution in 2025. With global coverage, deep customization options, and excellent performance benchmarks, it's the kind of infrastructure partner that lets you focus on shipping, not firefighting.
Explore RPC Fast and see how dedicated nodes should really perform!
