Blog
IaaS vs PaaS vs SaaS in Web3: What Should You Actually Choose in 2025?

IaaS vs PaaS vs SaaS in Web3: What Should You Actually Choose in 2025?

7
min read
Maksym Bohdan
June 11, 2025

When you’re just starting out in Web3, the easiest solution often wins. And nothing’s easier than SaaS: you connect to a node via API, pay $20/month, and you're live. No infrastructure to maintain, no backend to deploy. 

But with simplicity comes trade-offs:

  • Limited control;
  • Generic performance;
  • Little room to scale or customize.

As your product grows, so do your needs. Real-time data? Custom indexing? High uptime SLAs? SaaS starts falling short fast. That’s when teams start looking deeper—toward PaaS for more tooling and flexibility, or even IaaS for full control over the stack.

The problem? Most teams either jump in too early or too late, paying for features they don’t need—or missing critical capabilities when it matters most.

In this article, we unpack what SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS actually mean in a Web3 context, what each model gives (and takes), and how to choose the right fit.

What are IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS?

The pyramid illustrates the differences between IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS in terms of level of abstraction and target user, ranging from IT teams to end users.

Web3 infrastructure is built in layers. And whether you're launching a DeFi protocol or a cross-chain indexer, you're going to interact with one or all of these: IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS.

Each model answers a different question:

  • Do you want raw access to the blockchain itself?
  • Do you want tools to help you build on top of it?
  • Or do you want ready-made functionality you just plug into your app?

Let’s break it down.

SaaS – software as a service

SaaS apps run in the cloud, while non-SaaS apps run locally on the user's device.

SaaS is the most abstracted and ready-to-use model in Web3 infrastructure. You don’t deploy nodes. You don’t manage RPC endpoints. You don’t write indexers or spin up databases. You simply connect to a service that already did all of that — and exposes it to you via a clean API or SDK.

In the context of Web3, SaaS typically provides a specific piece of functionality that sits at the very top of the stack. You’re not accessing the blockchain directly — you’re consuming curated, post-processed data or features that someone else built and maintains.

What does SaaS look like in Web3?

You want to display token balances? Onboard users with social login? Trigger alerts for whale transactions? That’s SaaS territory.

Some real-world examples:

  • Covalent, Bitquery, Zerion API — give you wallet activity, token balances, and portfolio history across chains. You don’t have to write a single line of on-chain data parsing logic.
  • Web3Auth, Magic.link — abstract away private key management, letting users log in with Google, Apple, Twitter, or email. You get a self-custodial wallet, they never see the keys.
  • Thirdweb, Manifold, HyperMint — offer contract deployment interfaces, allowing you to launch NFT drops or token contracts without touching Solidity.
  • Dune, Nansen, Arkham Intelligence — operate as analytics SaaS platforms built on indexed blockchain data. You use dashboards or queries, not RPCs or subgraphs.

These tools don’t run on magic. They’re often powered by a mix of IaaS (node infrastructure), PaaS (indexing, event processing), and custom backend logic — but you never see or control that part. What you get is a polished surface layer: one endpoint, one function, one result.

It’s like Stripe for payments or Firebase for mobile apps — only now for wallets, NFTs, and token data.

Pros

  • Fast time to market — you integrate in hours, not weeks.
  • No DevOps required — infrastructure is abstracted away.
  • Great for MVPs and prototypes — helps you validate ideas without engineering overhead.

Cons

  • No control over data — if indexing is broken or slow, you can’t fix it.
  • Vendor lock-in — you depend on their APIs, their formats, their SLAs.
  • Limited performance — most SaaS products are rate-limited and not built for high-frequency or mission-critical systems.

So when should you use SaaS?

Use it when you're building something light, fast, and focused — or when your team lacks the resources to build and maintain blockchain infrastructure.

Don’t use SaaS when performance, latency, customization, or data integrity are critical to your product.

PaaS – platform as a service

PaaS is where builders take back control — without taking on the full weight of infrastructure. If SaaS gives you ready-made features, PaaS gives you the tools to build your own features, faster.

In Web3, PaaS sits in the middle layer between “plug-and-play” and “build-it-yourself.” It provides a managed development environment where you still write custom logic, but don’t have to worry about low-level details like node uptime, load balancing, or event indexing.

You get building blocks: hosted APIs, real-time event processing, indexing frameworks, developer portals, user auth layers, smart contract deployment environments — and you compose your app using those pieces.

PaaS lets developers build and run apps without managing servers, databases, or infrastructure.

What does PaaS look like in Web3?

Let’s say you need to:

  • Monitor wallet activity in real time
  • Store on-chain data in a queryable format
  • Trigger serverless functions when an event happens
  • Deploy smart contracts without managing testnets

These are all cases where PaaS shines. It doesn’t abstract everything — you still write logic — but it handles the infrastructure part of running that logic.

Examples:

  • Moralis — gives you real-time sync of on-chain data to a hosted DB, plus cloud functions, Web3 auth, file storage, and cross-chain support.
  • The Graph (hosted service) — turns raw blockchain events into indexed datasets you can query via GraphQL.
  • Alchemy and QuickNode Enhanced APIs — go beyond base RPC by offering things like NFT metadata APIs, mempool tracking, and transaction simulations.
  • Thirdweb infrastructure tools — host your contracts, handle SDK logic, and deploy them with built-in dashboards.

PaaS is especially useful when you’re working with events (like Transfer or Mint) and don’t want to build your own indexer. It’s also a step up when your data needs can’t be met by a static SaaS tool — but you still want hosted speed.

PaaS providers run their own nodes (IaaS), plus middleware to process blockchain events, normalize the data, and expose it via API or dev tools. They also offer managed auth, storage, and sometimes even front-end SDKs to help you move faster.

You still write smart contracts. You still call APIs. But you don’t have to worry about scaling them.

Pros

  • Faster than building from scratch — but still flexible
  • Developer-friendly — with real-time data and APIs tailored for Web3 use cases
  • Great middle ground — between speed and control

Cons

  • Not chain-agnostic — many platforms focus on specific chains or EVM only
  • Can get expensive — if your usage grows beyond free tiers
  • Limited transparency — you still rely on someone else’s backend and indexing logic

So when should you use PaaS?

PaaS is ideal when you want to own the product logic but don’t want to own infrastructure. It’s for teams that have developers, but not DevOps. It helps you go custom without going low-level.

Use it when your app relies on dynamic data, events, indexing, or fast iteration. Move on from it only when you hit scale or need full-stack performance control — and that’s where IaaS comes in.

IaaS – infrastructure as a service

IaaS is where abstraction ends — and full control begins.

In the Web3 world, IaaS means direct access to blockchain infrastructure. No helpers. No simplifiers. You connect directly to nodes (your own or dedicated), manage how you consume data, and decide how everything is monitored, balanced, and scaled.

You're responsible for architecting the whole system, but in return, you get full transparency, speed, reliability, and customization.

IaaS includes core infrastructure components like compute, storage, networking, and security—delivered as a service.

At this level, you don't rely on third-party APIs for token data or event logs. You talk directly to the blockchain, either via public RPCs (which are rate-limited and unstable) or by using a dedicated IaaS provider to spin up nodes just for you.

Use cases where IaaS is essential:

  • High-frequency trading bots — require sub-second latency, reliable mempool access, and consistent uptime;
  • Custom indexers — where no off-the-shelf solution exposes the data structure you need;
  • Security-sensitive apps — where relying on a third-party RPC could introduce attack vectors or data leaks;
  • Advanced analytics — that require deep, historical access to raw blockchain state;
  • DePIN, DeFi protocols, bridges — where performance and uptime define trust.

You don’t just fetch data — you design how it’s routed, cached, replicated, and secured.

Examples of IaaS usage:

  • Spinning up dedicated Solana full/archive nodes via Dysnix with AI-based load balancing and up to 5000 RPS;
  • Running private Ethereum or BSC nodes in a geo-distributed cluster with automated failover;
  • Using real-time dashboards and logs to monitor traffic and detect anomalies;
  • Choosing between public RPC, shared infrastructure, or private environments depending on your risk profile.

What exactly do you manage?

  • Node deployment — full vs archive, chain-specific configs;
  • Latency and throughput optimization — load balancing, routing;
  • Monitoring and alerting — uptime tracking, API error detection;
  • Security — private networking, access control, data integrity.

You can use managed providers (like Dysnix) to avoid doing all of this manually, but you're still thinking at the infrastructure level — not just application logic.

Pros

  • Maximum control — tailor everything to your app's needs;
  • Performance-first — critical for apps that depend on speed and data fidelity;
  • Custom everything — deploy what you need, not what someone else packaged.

Cons

  • Requires expertise — infrastructure, networking, DevOps, observability;
  • Higher operational cost — you pay for power and flexibility;
  • Not for MVPs — unless your MVP needs mission-critical infra from day one.

So when should you use IaaS?

IaaS is not for everyone — but it’s essential if you're building infrastructure-heavy products or systems that can't afford abstraction: bots, DEXes, L2s, oracle networks, real-time analytics platforms, and high-value wallets.

You’ll know you need IaaS when:

  • SaaS is too opaque;
  • PaaS is too limiting;
  • And your team is ready to own the infrastructure behind what you build.

Comparison table: IaaS vs PaaS vs SaaS

Parameter IaaS (Infrastructure) PaaS (Platform) SaaS (Software)
Control Full control over logic, requests, routing, infrastructure usage Moderate—app logic is flexible, but platform imposes structure and limits Minimal—you consume what’s exposed via API/SDK
Setup complexity High—requires understanding of nodes, chains, sync, scaling Medium—abstracted infra, but devs still write logic and configure services Very low—ready-made service, no backend required
Performance tuning Full—control over latency, throughput, error handling Limited—tuning options depend on the platform None—performance is locked to provider’s setup
Customization Full—you build your logic on raw data Partial—limited to the abstractions and APIs offered Very limited—pre-defined workflows only
Infrastructure access Direct—archive nodes, tracing, mempool access Indirect—handled by the platform Not exposed—everything is abstracted
Use cases Real-time trading, liquidations, MEV, analytics requiring low-level access dApps needing indexed data, auth, user/session handling, rapid prototyping Token data APIs, wallet onboarding, compliance tools, analytics, notification services
DevOps requirements High—must monitor usage, handle rate limits, manage provider integrations Low—platform handles infra, but integration logic remains None—just plug and play
Typical providers Dysnix, Ankr, Infura, QuickNode, Chainstack Moralis, The Graph (hosted), Chainbase, Covalent (hybrid), Alchemy SDKs Web3Auth, NFTPort, Bitquery, Dune, Nansen
Cost structure Per RPS / Dedicated infra—usually scales with traffic and capacity Subscription-based or per-API call tiered pricing Mostly fixed subscriptions or per-use fees
Best for Teams needing full control, low-level access, or performance guarantees Startups and devs who want to move fast with fewer backend burdens Anyone needing fast integration of a specific Web3 feature or data without infrastructure

How to сhoose: IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS?

Start with the basics: how close to the chain do you really need to be?

If your goal is to ship fast, validate an idea, or build a UI-first product—SaaS is your best friend. You plug into ready-made APIs, skip the backend work, and focus entirely on frontend and user experience. For dashboards, portfolio trackers, or social features, there’s rarely a need to go lower. You won’t have much control—but you also won’t have much overhead.

If you need more customization—say, custom business logic, direct control over indexing, or orchestration of multiple on-chain workflows—PaaS hits the sweet spot. It abstracts node ops and infra setup but still gives you programmable logic and deployable backends. Most dApps that grow beyond MVPs end up here.

But if your product needs full control—like real-time mempool tracking, high-frequency trading bots, protocol-level development, or custom RPC behavior—you’ll need IaaS. This is infrastructure in its rawest form: unabstracted, powerful, but demanding. It’s the hardest to manage, but also the most flexible.

Team skill set and speed to market

The expertise of your team often determines both how fast you can launch and how far you can scale. If you don’t have in-house DevOps—someone who can run nodes, manage uptime, and scale infrastructure—IaaS will slow you down. It gives full control but requires serious operational ownership.

That’s why early teams often turn to SaaS or PaaS. With SaaS, you don’t need backend engineers at all—just frontend devs wiring APIs. With PaaS, your developers stay focused on product logic while infrastructure runs in the background.

This makes SaaS and PaaS ideal for MVPs, hackathons, and early-stage products.

Performance, latency, and architecture control

Some products can live with occasional latency. Others—like MEV bots, trading platforms, or real-time analytics—can’t. In those cases, SaaS and most PaaS platforms won’t cut it. You need raw RPC access, regional node placement, WebSocket support, and direct mempool feeds.

Only IaaS gives that level of control. You decide where requests are routed, how caching works, and how to handle retries. It’s more effort—but if speed and reliability define your edge, you don’t want middleware standing in the way.

Modularity and stack composability

In Web3, one layer is rarely enough. Most real-world setups combine them: SaaS for user analytics or alerts, PaaS for wallet indexing and events, IaaS for raw chain data and latency-critical actions.

The best stack is often a mix—not a choice. Use each layer where it makes sense. Own the critical paths. Offload the rest.

Here's what it looks like in practice

Let’s say you're building a real-time DeFi dashboard—one that pulls on-chain data from Ethereum and Solana, shows token balances, parses transaction history, and lets users log in with social accounts. The stack needs to be reliable, scalable, and fast enough to support real-time updates.

Here’s how the architecture could look across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS layers:

IaaS Layer—reliable access to blockchain data

Instead of relying on public RPC endpoints or running their own nodes, the team uses Dysnix to deploy dedicated infrastructure across multiple blockchains. This setup is tailored to meet their performance and reliability needs.

  • Throughput: Up to 5000 RPS per chain
  • Load balancing: AI-based, across multiple geo regions
  • Node types: Full + Archive nodes for both chains
  • Monitoring: Real-time dashboards and usage analytics
  • Support: 24/7 engineering team via Discord
  • SLA: 99.99% uptime

It enables the team to handle sudden data spikes and run complex aggregation logic on top of the raw blockchain state, such as calculating liquidity across multiple contracts or monitoring mempool activity for bots.

PaaS Layer—indexing, user state & dev acceleration

To avoid building custom indexers, the team integrates:

  • The Graph to index specific smart contracts and expose them via GraphQL queries. This allows the frontend to fetch structured data like “all staking positions” or “events from contract X.”
  • Moralis (or a self-hosted backend modeled similarly) to sync wallet data, manage user sessions, and trigger real-time events on specific on-chain activity.

This middle layer saves months of backend engineering time. Instead of decoding logs manually, developers write a subgraph or connect to a WebSocket stream, and the platform delivers clean, structured data.

SaaS Layer—wallet onboarding & enhanced UX

For user authentication and token display, the project integrates two battle-tested services:

  • Web3Auth to onboard users with Google or Twitter and create self-custodial wallets. This removes the friction of MetaMask popups and seed phrases for new users.
  • Covalent API to fetch multi-chain token balances, token metadata, and historical activity. It’s used in the dashboard UI to display wallet stats instantly, without querying the chain directly.

These tools sit on top of the stack—cleanly abstracted and integrated via SDKs.

This architecture showcases how a modern Web3 app can combine:

  • IaaS for raw, high-performance blockchain connectivity
  • PaaS (The Graph + Moralis) for speed and structure in backend development
  • SaaS (Web3Auth + Covalent) for polished user experience and data richness

And most importantly, the team stays lean. No one’s writing indexers from scratch. No one’s running their own validator nodes. But they still retain control where it matters: performance, security, and data accuracy.

This is what composable infrastructure looks like in practice.

The stack you choose shapes the product you build

Choosing between IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS isn't just a technical decision—it's a strategic one. The deeper your product goes into performance, latency, or on-chain complexity, the more critical your infrastructure becomes.

While SaaS and PaaS tools help you move fast, your IaaS layer is what ensures stability under pressure. That’s exactly where Dysnix comes in—not just as a node provider, but as your long-term partner in Web3 infrastructure.

“Our mission at Dysnix is to remove the invisible friction that slows down Web3 teams, from missed transactions to scaling pains. We focus on reliability so you can focus on building.”

👉 Start with Dysnix—and let your infrastructure scale with you!

Maksym Bohdan
Writer at Dysnix
Author, Web3 enthusiast, and innovator in new technologies
Related articles
Subscribe to the blog
The best source of information for customer service, sales tips, guides, and industry best practices. Join us.
Thanks for subscribing to the Dysnix blog
Now you’ll be the first to know when we publish a new post
Got it
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Copied to Clipboard
Paste it wherever you like